We had the same issue at work and finally decided to use Taiga <https://taiga.io/>. It was the perfect answer for our requirements but highly oriented to Scrum projects.
2017-10-03 21:13 GMT+02:00 Nuritzi Sanchez <nurit...@stanfordalumni.org>: > Hey Sri, I was hoping to take a look at GitLab's kanban board since I > actually do think it could work for engagement and marketing and it could > then help people unfamiliar with that structure to be more comfortable in > participating in dev teams later on. At Endless, we've moved our marketing > and community teams to our kaban board tool (Phabricator). > > Could we set up a test case? Maybe that's something we can look into > together at GNOME.Asia. > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna <s...@ramkrishna.me> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 12:36 PM Alexandre Franke <afra...@gnome.org> >> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna <s...@ramkrishna.me> >>> wrote: >>> > I'd like to start moving away from the wiki for our project management >>> and >>> > move to something that is focused on team based things. I did some >>> > evaluation, and I'd like to propose fluxday.io. It is very similar >>> to what >>> > we are using at work, which is dapulse which I've been digging a lot. >>> I >>> > just feel that what we have is clunky and hard to use and is not >>> efficient. >>> > Tell me what you guys think? >>> >>> Like I always say to my customers when they come to me and ask me for >>> this or that tool: what is the problem you are trying to solve? >>> “Project management” is not an acceptable answer. ☺ I’m never opposed >>> to any tool (software license and privacy are not an issue here since >>> it’s Free and we would host our instance) but one should use a tool >>> because it is the right one for their task at hand, not because it >>> looks cool. >>> >> >> Yes, I am definitely trying to solve a problem. >> >> We are doing project management through a wiki and etherpad. This is a >> horrible way to set and figure out the tasks. While there is no native >> client for project management we seem to be blessed with many open source >> project management software that we can try out and see if we can help >> track our tasks. We don't have a lot of resources, and having software >> that maximizes our productivity given our constraints is a good thing. For >> instance, GNOME releases would be a lot more easier if we have all that >> mapped out with tasks already set. >> >> >>> Same logic applies to kanban boards (someone recently said we should >>> use gitlab because it has kanban boards). >>> >> >> We could look at it, but gitlab doesn't really deal well with engagement >> and marketing I would reckon right? I'm willing to look at existing things >> we have already.. I will look into gitlab's kanboard stuff. Although I'm >> not that impressed with kanban. >> >> >>> > I'd like to try to spin up a docker instance somewhere and see if we >>> can >>> > test it. >>> >>> Sure, testing is always good. >>> >> >> Indeed. >> >> sri >> >> >>> -- >>> Alexandre Franke >>> GNOME Hacker & Foundation Director >>> _______________________________________________ >>> engagement-list mailing list >>> engagement-list@gnome.org >>> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> engagement-list mailing list >> engagement-list@gnome.org >> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list >> >> > > > -- > > ............................................................ > ................. > > *Nuritzi Sanchez* | +1.650.218.7388 | Endless <http://endlessm.com/> > > _______________________________________________ > engagement-list mailing list > engagement-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list > >
_______________________________________________ engagement-list mailing list engagement-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
