On 02/14/2012 11:36 PM, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
On 02/14/2012 10:03 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 02/14/2012 09:20 AM, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
On 02/14/2012 08:59 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 02/14/2012 08:57 AM, Livnat Peer wrote:
On 14/02/12 05:56, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 02/13/2012 12:32 PM, Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
Hi,

Please review the plan document for autorecovery.
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/Autorecovery
why would we disable auto recovery by default? it sounds like the
preferred behavior?

I think that by default Laszlo meant in the upgrade process to maintain
current behavior.

I agree that for new entities the default should be true.
i think the only combination which will allow this is for db to default
to false and code to default to true for this property?
Why can't we during upgrade process set to all existing entities in DB
the value to false, but still have the column defined as "default true"?
because upgrade and clean install are running the same scripts?
I guess I still fail to understand.
Scenarios (as both upgrade and clean install run the same scripts)
a. In environment to be upgraded we have X entities that are non
recoverable - after upgrade these X entities have the boolean flag set
to false. New entities in the system will be created with auto
recoverable set to true.

I still fail to understand why you 'punish' existing objects and not giving them the new feature enabled by default.
Y.

b. In environment to be clean installed -we have 0 existing entities -
after clean install all new entities in the system will be create with
auto recoverable set to true.
Will this be considered a bad behavior?


_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
Engine-devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel

_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
Engine-devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel

Reply via email to