> ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Saggi Mizrahi" <smizr...@redhat.com> > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 4:39:49 PM > > I do express that empty mount options SHOULD NOT send an empty > string, rather, omit the whole argument.
Yes, this should be handled on the backend side (Yair - please note, maybe it is already implemented like this - don't know): When getting a null-or-empty "mount options" value from the client, the backend needs to make sure to *not* set the relevant parameter in the vdsm verb at all. So leaving the "mount options" text-box empty in the GUI is legal, only needs to be handled in a certain way in the backend. > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Einav Cohen" <eco...@redhat.com> > > To: "Yair Zaslavsky" <yzasl...@redhat.com>, "Ayal Baron" > > <aba...@redhat.com> > > Cc: "Saggi Mizrahi" <smizr...@redhat.com>, "Andrew Cathrow" > > <acath...@redhat.com>, "Miki Kenneth" > > <mkenn...@redhat.com>, "Simon Grinberg" <sgrin...@redhat.com>, > > "Eldan Hildesheim" <ehild...@redhat.com>, "Eldan > > Hildesheim" <i...@eldanet.com>, "Alexey Chub" <ac...@redhat.com>, > > engine-devel@ovirt.org, "Haim Ateya" > > <hat...@redhat.com> > > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 9:28:31 AM > > Subject: Re: PosixFS: GUI mock-ups have been updated > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Yair Zaslavsky" <yzasl...@redhat.com> > > > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 4:21:42 PM > > > > > > On 05/10/2012 04:16 PM, Einav Cohen wrote: > > > > Please review the mock-ups on the feature page: > > > > http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/PosixFSConnection#Changes_in_GUI > > > > > > > > Comments are welcome. > > > > > > From talking to Haim I understood that path should include ":" > > > > From talking to Ayal, the path can be similar in its format to a > > path > > provided when creating an NFS storage domain (e.g. > > "server:/dir1/dir2"), *or* to a path provided when creating a Local > > storage domain (e.g. "/tmp/dir3"), meaning, without ":". > > @Ayal - any chance for a clarification here? > > > > > In addition - if we only support V1, why add the combo box? > > > > We are always showing the combo-box, even if we have only one > > option > > in it (so the user will know what is the value that is being sent). > > However, we disable it. I updated the mock-up to clarify this. > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > ---- > > > > Thanks, > > > > Einav > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Engine-devel mailing list > Engine-devel@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel > > > _______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
