> ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ayal Baron" <aba...@redhat.com> > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:46:44 PM > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Einav Cohen" <eco...@redhat.com> > > > To: "Andrew Cathrow" <acath...@redhat.com> > > > Cc: engine-devel@ovirt.org, "Simon Grinberg" > > > <sgrin...@redhat.com>, > > > "Saggi Mizrahi" <smizr...@redhat.com>, "Geert > > > Jansen" <gjan...@redhat.com>, "Ori Liel" <ol...@redhat.com>, > > > "Yair > > > Zaslavsky" <yzasl...@redhat.com>, "Ayal Baron" > > > <aba...@redhat.com>, "Miki Kenneth" <mkenn...@redhat.com> > > > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 2:05:55 PM > > > Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] PosixFS: GUI mock-ups have been > > > updated > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > The important thing is that it's clear what it is - eg. the > > > > remote/target not the local mount point. That could be > > > > accomplished > > > > in the tool tip, etc. > > > > > > So if there will be a tool-tip (or similar) in the GUI explaining > > > what this field is supposed to be, are you OK with keeping the > > > term > > > "Path" (in both GUI and rest-api)? > > > > I am , does everyone else agree. > > either 'path' or 'device'
- "Path" it is.
- Instead of a tool-tip, I suggest to use an explanation caption below the
text-box (similar to what we have for NFS storage domain - see attached).
Agreed?
- What should be the exact phrasing of the explanation text?
> "mount [-fnrsvw] [-t vfstype] [-o options] device dir"
>
> device is what is being mounted and in the case of NFS is server:path
>
> There is a reason why we termed it PosixFS and not SharedFS and that
> users can specify local devices/FS's (and there is no reason to
> limit it).
>
> Note that if user defines a local FS and adds 2 hosts to the Posix FS
> DC then 1 host will be non-op
>
> Miki - this is not cluster level seeing as PosixFS is a DC type
> (afaik) so no need for tooltips about that.
>
> In the future when we get rid of the single storage type in DC
> limitation then we'll be able to define a local posixFS domain and a
> shared one.
>
>
>
>
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > Andrew/Geert/Simon/Ayal/Miki/Saggi/others: Please feel free
> > > > > to
> > > > > suggest a new term, or vote for one of the
> > > > > previously-discussed
> > > > > terms ("Remote Path" / "Path" / "Mount Spec" / "File System
> > > > > URI").
> > > > > If no decision will be made here, the term will remain as-is,
> > > > > i.e.
> > > > > "Path".
> > > > >
> > > > ...
> > >
> >
>
<<attachment: NewNfsStorageDomainDialog-PathExplanation.png>>
_______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
