Hi.
I think the fact that when updating (PUT), we may send only the updated
xml elements violates following.
http://www.ics.uci.edu/~fielding/pubs/dissertation/rest_arch_style.htm
------8<------8<------8<------8<------
Figure 5-2: The client-server style
5.1.3 Stateless
We next add a constraint to the client-server interaction: communication
must be stateless in nature, as in the client-stateless-server (CSS)
style of Section 3.4.3 (Figure 5-3), such that each request from client
to server must contain all of the information necessary to understand
the request, and cannot take advantage of any stored context on the
server. Session state is therefore kept entirely on the client.
------8<------8<------8<------8<------
Am I right? If so, this is quite huge violation. Much much bigger than
some state of SESSION_ID/TOKEN. Would caches/proxies work well with
current design?
Jaroslav Henner.
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
Engine-devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
