Hi Itamar,

>> 3. follow GWTP 0.7 migration steps
>> <http://code.google.com/p/gwt-platform/wiki/PortingV1#V0.7>, which will
>> most likely involve UI code changes
>
> can these be backward compatible with gwt 2.3?

In short, yes.

Technically, GWTP 0.7 should work with GWT 2.3 - GWTP migration wiki doesn't 
mention this explicitly.
Practically, GWTP 0.7 is built against GWT 2.4 - see "gwt.version" definition 
in [http://code.google.com/p/gwt-platform/source/browse/pom.xml?name=gwtp-0.7]

>> 5. adjust UI code regarding GWT Editor framework, which is now capable
>> of handling primitive boolean is/has getter methods
>> <http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6040>
>
> is this 2.3 compatible?
> is it a must step or optional?

Step 5 is not compatible with GWT 2.3. It represents a bugfix that is shipped 
in GWT 2.4.
Steps 4 and 5 are optional (cleanup-like), but should be done in long-term.

> 6. test thoroughly webadmin and user portal behave correctly...

Fully agreed.

Vojtech


----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" <[email protected]>
To: "Vojtech Szocs" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 5:48:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] GWT 2.4.0 and the oVirt Engine

On 06/19/2012 05:40 PM, Vojtech Szocs wrote:
> Hi Dustin,
...

> 3. follow GWTP 0.7 migration steps
> <http://code.google.com/p/gwt-platform/wiki/PortingV1#V0.7>, which will
> most likely involve UI code changes

can these be backward compatible with gwt 2.3?

>
>
> For all steps mentioned above, I'm planning to make a patch, since step
> (3) requires deeper knowledge of GWTP/WebAdmin code.
>
>
>
> In addition, here are the extra steps to finalize the migration (these
> items are relevant long-term, can be skipped for now):
>
>
> 4. remove HTML5 drag'n'drop classes (originally copied from GWT 2.4
> trunk) by removing following WebAdmin packages:
>
>   * com.google.gwt.dom.client
>   * com.google.gwt.event.dom.client
>
> 5. adjust UI code regarding GWT Editor framework, which is now capable
> of handling primitive boolean is/has getter methods
> <http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6040>

is this 2.3 compatible?
is it a must step or optional?

6. test thoroughly webadmin and user portal behave correctly...
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel

Reply via email to