On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 04:53:04AM -0400, Ayal Baron wrote: > Hi all, > > Sorry for cross-posting, but in this case I think it's relevant. > > The original idea was that every time we wish to discuss a new > cross-component feature we should do it over arch list. However, it would > appear that de-facto usually engine-devel and vdsm-devel are being used > (cross posted). > Currently engine-devel has 211 subscribers, arch has 160 and vdsm-devel has > 128 so from this perspective again, arch seems less relevant. > I propose we ditch arch and keep the other 2 mailing lists. > I'm not sure whether new cross-component features should be discussed solely > on engine-devel or cross-posted (there are probably people who wouldn't care > about engine side but would still like to know about such changes).
+1 to ditching arch. I would still prefer that cross-component features cross-post to vdsm-devel and engine-devel. My current focus is on vdsm and the traffic level on that list is currently far more manageable than that of engine-devel. -- Adam Litke <a...@us.ibm.com> IBM Linux Technology Center _______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel