----- Original Message ----- > From: "Itamar Heim" <ih...@redhat.com> > To: "Laszlo Hornyak" <lhorn...@redhat.com> > Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel@ovirt.org> > Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2012 8:16:48 PM > Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] operation mode > > On 11/01/2012 10:57 AM, Laszlo Hornyak wrote: > > The same question applies to HypervisorType, since only KVM is > > supported. > > I think this one is worth a bit more thinking before removing > actually, > but if you remove it in a single patch, easy enough to revert should > we > want to add something like this back (and the enum is far from all > that > needs to be done anyway for such a thing)
Do you plan to support hypervisors other than qemu+kvm? > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <lhorn...@redhat.com> > >> To: "engine-devel" <engine-devel@ovirt.org> > >> Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2012 9:43:14 AM > >> Subject: [Engine-devel] operation mode > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I have just run into this. Vm's have an OperationMode attribute, > >> it > >> can be FullVirtualized or ParaVirtualized. It appears the > >> attribute > >> does not play in any decision, not sent to vdsm. Can it be removed > >> or anyone need it? > >> > >> thx, > >> Laszlo > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Engine-devel mailing list > >> Engine-devel@ovirt.org > >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Engine-devel mailing list > > Engine-devel@ovirt.org > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel > > > > > _______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel