On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 09:37:03AM +0100, Vinzenz Feenstra wrote: <snip> > >>> > >>> > >>> Improvement of the Guest Agent: > >>> > >>>As part of the proposed solution it is necessary to improve the > >>>guest agent as well. > >>Improving the agent may be a good idea, but I do not see the necessity > >>in it. > The guest agent is doing 'expensive' queries (e.g. > "application_list") way too often. And things like network > interfaces, disk usage and installed applications won't usually > change every n minutes. > Those queries could be much more reactive then proactive.
Of course, but as I said: > >>It's also important to improve the horrible multithreaded > >>vdsm/libvirt statistics acquisition, but just as unrelated to the core > >>of this feature. I think it is misleading to include this in the discussion about vdsm/Engine interface change. _______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel