On 06/30/2013 12:20 PM, Liran Zelkha wrote: > I checked such a solution using JProfiler. Creating the GUID object takes > much more CPU cycles that checking the string in the Map.
of course it is, but what is the size of map that you checked?, check on worst scenario, i.e map is full of all possible guids, also problem a bit different,java map has a load factor (which is usually 0.75), when ratio increases beyond the load factor, occurs proses called re-hash so that the hash table will double amount of buckets. what can produce a cpu spikes (though it should not happen too often), to avoid this the initial capacity should be greater than the maximum number of entries / the load factor, and this is a huge map.... so basically this is a tradeoff between time and space costs against the new guid generation. > > On Jun 30, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Michael Pasternak wrote: > >> On 06/30/2013 11:37 AM, Liran Zelkha wrote: >>> Great news. >>> Allon - please note that GUID is being recreated from String by both DB >>> calls and by data received from VDSM. It is VERY useful to cache Guid >>> String-->Guid, and not just Empty GUID. >>> >>> However, as the Guid class runs in GWT as well, you can't use Infinispan >>> and you're limited in the HashMap implementations you can use. >>> Personally, I don't think it's a memory leak, as GUID number in the system >>> are finite and not too large. >> >> it's large, it's 128-bit random number, it's not about memory leaking, but >> cpu cost, >> as you'll face a lot of rehash'ings in the map, >> >> i'm not even sure that using indexing in the map can help, worth checking. >> >> What do you think? Want to add it to your patch? >> >> >>> >>> On Jun 30, 2013, at 11:13 AM, Yair Zaslavsky wrote: >>> >>>> Well done, should have been done ages ago :) >>>> Now, for the painful rebase of async_task_mgr changes :) >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> From: "Allon Mureinik" <amure...@redhat.com> >>>>> To: "engine-devel" <engine-devel@ovirt.org>, "Barak Azulay" >>>>> <bazu...@redhat.com> >>>>> Cc: "Yair Zaslavsky" <yzasl...@redhat.com>, "Michael Pasternak" >>>>> <mpast...@redhat.com>, "Tal Nisan" >>>>> <tni...@redhat.com>, "Ayal Baron" <aba...@redhat.com> >>>>> Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2013 11:11:30 AM >>>>> Subject: Guid improvements >>>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> I just merged a couple of improvements to the [N]Guid class [1] to improve >>>>> it's performance both CPU-wise and memory-wise, based on a set of >>>>> benchmarks >>>>> presented by Liran. >>>>> >>>>> What this patchset achieves: >>>>> 1. Clean up the code, so it's easier to understand and use >>>>> 2. Eliminate the inflation in the memory foot print caused by the >>>>> getValue() >>>>> method >>>>> 3. Eliminate all the heavy calls to UUID.fromString when creating a >>>>> new/empty >>>>> Guid instance as a default value >>>>> 4. Note that the cleanups proposed in (1) will have minor performance >>>>> benefits (e.g., eliminating useless conditional statements), but I doubt >>>>> this would be anything to write home about. >>>>> >>>>> From a developer's perspective, here's what changed: >>>>> 1. No more NGuid, just Guid. Both static methods to create a Guid from >>>>> String >>>>> still exist, and are named createGuidFromString and >>>>> createGuidFromStringDefaultEmpty. >>>>> 2. [N]Guid.getValue() was removed, it's no longer needed after (1) was >>>>> implemented >>>>> 3. The Guid() constructor was made private, as it forced a redundant call >>>>> to >>>>> UUID.fromString(String). If you need an empty Guid instance, just use >>>>> Guid.Empty >>>>> 4. The Guid.EMPTY_GUID_VALUE string constant was removed, as it was used >>>>> for >>>>> redundant calls to UUID.fromString. If you really, REALLY, need it, just >>>>> call Guid.Empty.getValue() for a UUID or Guid.Empty.toString() for a >>>>> String. >>>>> 5. All sorts of ways to transform Strings to Guids were removed. If you >>>>> have >>>>> a literal you trust, just use new Guid(String). If you suspect it may be >>>>> null, use Guid.createGuidFromString[DefaultEmpty] >>>>> 6. NewGuid is now called newGuid. We're in Java, not C# :-) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Many thanks to everyone who reviewed this patchset. >>>>> You guys rock! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Allon >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [1] >>>>> http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/project:ovirt-engine+branch:master+topic:guid-cleanup,n,z >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Engine-devel mailing list >>>> Engine-devel@ovirt.org >>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Engine-devel mailing list >>> Engine-devel@ovirt.org >>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> Michael Pasternak >> RedHat, ENG-Virtualization R&D > -- Michael Pasternak RedHat, ENG-Virtualization R&D _______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
