----- Original Message ----- > From: "Liran Zelkha" <liran.zel...@gmail.com> > To: "Gilad Chaplik" <gchap...@redhat.com> > Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel@ovirt.org> > Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 2:04:29 PM > Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] vds_dynamic refactor > > Why not move it to vds_static?
+1 on Liran's comment. I would prefer not to add more complexity to the vds tables family. Such complexity may effect performs of queries/views. If you wish, you can create a view on top of vds_static named vds_on_boot for querying of vds on boot info. Yair > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Gilad Chaplik <gchap...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > Hi list, > > > > I propose to split vds_dynamic table into 2 tables: > > - vds_dynamic > > - vds_on_boot > > We need a place to put all non-dynamic data that gets updated once the > > host is booted, and I think dynamic isn't the place for it. > > In first phase we will put there NUMA host topoplogy, but later on migrate > > all non-dynamic host data (cpu, os, etc.). > > > > thoughts? > > > > Thanks, > > Gilad. > > _______________________________________________ > > Engine-devel mailing list > > Engine-devel@ovirt.org > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > Engine-devel mailing list > Engine-devel@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel > _______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
