It seems like inviting trouble to have multiple versions of a
particular framework or plugin sitting side-by-side in the location
from which they are loaded. Certainly this is going to be problematic
if engines ever start up automatically (like plugins do, and this
*may* happen).

With this in mind, I'd recommend that you use an alternative strategy.
One suggestion might be to store your multiple copies in
/vendor/some_other_dir, and create symlinks (or just delete and
re-copy on Windows) to the particular version you want. Another option
might be to use SVN, either directly or via some set of rake tasks, to
up/downgrade the engine at will, and migrate the engine down and back
up to the latest set of migrations for that particular version of the
engine. Again - getting complex, and the recommended mechanism for
performing engine migrations is going to change in a not-too-distant
version too.

I guess in summary - not really a good idea to hve multiple version of
the same component sitting in a directory where things might get
automatically loaded.

Incidentally, why did you want the user to have multiple versions?

- james

On 5/2/06, Daniel Siemssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm a developer of the Rails-CMS RailFrog (www.railfrog.com). We want to
> use RailsEngines as part of our plugin system. So far it works great but
> now we want to append a version string to the engine-dir (i.e.
> railfrog_admin_ui-0.5.3), so that the user can have multiple versions of
> the same engine in /vendor/plugins with only one being active at one
> time. But since RailsEngines uses the directory name to get the engine
> name, migrations from one version to another won't work because migrate
> uses the engine name _with_ the version string in the schema info table.
> So my question is, if either there is a way to set the engine name
> manually or if you think that it would be a good idea to replace the
> current naming convention with one that supports this kind of directory
> names and uses the name before the version string as engine name.
>
> Thanks
> Daniel
>
> _______________________________________________
> engine-developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.rails-engines.org/listinfo.cgi/engine-developers-rails-engines.org
>


--
* J *
  ~
_______________________________________________
engine-developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rails-engines.org/listinfo.cgi/engine-developers-rails-engines.org

Reply via email to