Mike Kolesnik has posted comments on this change.

Change subject: engine: Extended error for pinned host missing non required 
network
......................................................................


Patch Set 5: (3 inline comments)

....................................................
File 
backend/manager/modules/bll/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/core/bll/VdsSelector.java
Line 109:                 // we are checking for 2 because the first 2 (0 and 
1) are the messaged for
Line 110:                 // object and action type and we don't want to 
override them,
Line 111:                 // we do override any previous message because this 
one has priority.
Line 112:                 if (messages.size() > 2) {
Line 113:                     messages.add(2,
So in this case, is there reason to use 2?

Also part of the comment above becomes obsolete.
Line 114:                             
VdcBllMessages.VM_PINNED_TO_HOST_CANNOT_RUN_ON_THE_DEFAULT_VDS_WITH_REASON.toString());
Line 115:                 } else {
Line 116:                     
messages.add(VdcBllMessages.VM_PINNED_TO_HOST_CANNOT_RUN_ON_THE_DEFAULT_VDS.toString());
Line 117:                 }


Line 112:                 if (messages.size() > 2) {
Line 113:                     messages.add(2,
Line 114:                             
VdcBllMessages.VM_PINNED_TO_HOST_CANNOT_RUN_ON_THE_DEFAULT_VDS_WITH_REASON.toString());
Line 115:                 } else {
Line 116:                     
messages.add(VdcBllMessages.VM_PINNED_TO_HOST_CANNOT_RUN_ON_THE_DEFAULT_VDS.toString());
I am wondering if it would make sense to use the same message here..
What do you think?
Line 117:                 }
Line 118:                 return false;
Line 119:             }
Line 120:             returnValue = canFindAnyVds(messages, isMigrate);


....................................................
File backend/manager/modules/dal/src/main/resources/bundles/AppErrors.properties
Line 153: ACTION_TYPE_FAILED_VM_IS_PINNED_TO_HOST=Cannot ${action} ${type}. VM 
is pinned to Host.
Line 154: VM_PINNED_TO_HOST_CANNOT_RUN_ON_THE_DEFAULT_VDS=Cannot ${action} 
${type}. VM is pinned to a specific Host but cannot run on it due to:\n\
Line 155:     Invalid Host status or not enough free resources on it.\n\
Line 156:       You may free resources on the Host by migrating other VMs.
Line 157: VM_PINNED_TO_HOST_CANNOT_RUN_ON_THE_DEFAULT_VDS_WITH_REASON = Cannot 
${action} ${type}. VM is pinned to a specific Host but cannot run on it.
I'm not sure that spaces around the equals are necessary
Line 158: VM_HOSTCPU_MUST_BE_PINNED_TO_HOST=Cannot ${action} ${type}. VM with 
host cpu flags must be pinned to host.
Line 159: ACTION_TYPE_FAILED_VM_NOT_EXIST=Cannot ${action} ${type}. VM doesn't 
exist.
Line 160: ACTION_TYPE_FAILED_VM_ALREADY_EXIST=Cannot ${action} ${type}. VM with 
the same name already exists.
Line 161: 
ACTION_TYPE_FAILED_VM_CANNOT_BE_HIGHLY_AVAILABLE_AND_PINNED_TO_HOST=Cannot 
${action} ${type}. A highly available VM cannot be pinned to a specific Host


--
To view, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/11338
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/settings

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ibf9703ae06b06be96c6508d48306d8bd6b8bcfbb
Gerrit-PatchSet: 5
Gerrit-Project: ovirt-engine
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Alona Kaplan <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alona Kaplan <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Mike Kolesnik <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Moti Asayag <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Engine-patches mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-patches

Reply via email to