Here's my rating of the 8 unrated levels:
{ file=level6a name="Space Pirates"
author="Siegfried Fennig" par_time=62,Ralf
revision=2 int=2 dex=2 pat=2 kno=2 spe=2}
{ file=level4f name="Running Rings"
author="Siegfried Fennig" par_time=292,Stephanie int=3
dex=2 pat=3 kno=2 spe=2}
{ file=level2d name="Tricks & Traps"
author="Siegfried Fennig" par_time=396,Stephanie int=4
dex=2 pat=3 kno=3 spe=1}
{ file=level6c name="Jump And Run"
author="Siegfried Fennig" par_time=186,Ronald int=3
dex=3 pat=3 kno=2 spe=3}
{ file=ant11 name="Cannonball"
author="Petr Machata" par_time=77,Ant int=1 dex=4
pat=2 kno=2 spe=3}
{ file=duffy5 name="Just Moving Blocks?"
author="Jacob Scott" par_time=53,Markus int=4
dex=2 pat=3 kno=3 spe=2}
{ file=duffy12 name="Just a Maze?"
author="Jacob Scott" par_time=92,Duffy int=2
dex=2 pat=3 kno=2 spe=4}
{ file=level11a name="Domain of Mysteries"
author="Siegfried Fennig" par_time=213,Duffy int=3
dex=3 pat=3 kno=3 spe=2}
I think this rating system will work well -- it's easier to rate
levels with it than by just giving each level a total difficulty
rating, and probably makes it easier to combine multiple players'
ratings.
Jacob
On 7/21/05, Andreas Lochmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -- not ranked: level6a = Space Pirates
> -- level4f = Running Rings
> -- level2d = Tricks & Traps
> -- level6c = Jump And Run
> -- ant11 = Cannonball
> -- duffy5 = Just Moving Blocks?
> -- duffy12 = Just A Maze?
> -- level11a = Domain of Mysteries
_______________________________________________
Enigma-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/enigma-devel