On Wed 2016-06-01 16:28:51 -0400, Ludwig Hügelschäfer wrote:
> On 01.06.16 19:52, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>
>> I agree that keeping some state (or being able to infer state) about
>> whether your peer likely has your key would be a useful thing. I'm not
>> sure what the right rules would be to make this relatively seamless and
>> not-confusing, though.
>
> One thing is clear: If the local installation has already received
> encrypted mails from this address, it is no longer necessary to send the
> own key again. Not sure how to implement this, this would require some
> sort of mini-addressbook.
Can we piggy-back enigmail's state on thunderbird's own addressbook?
Also, if the user's own certificate (or their encryption-capable subkey)
was due to expire, but they updated the expiration date (or issued a new
encryption-capable subkey), should they re-send their certificate to the
peer?
--dkg
_______________________________________________
enigmail-users mailing list
enigmail-users@enigmail.net
To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here:
https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net
