On 05/20/18 05:22, Andrew Gallagher wrote: > > I said earlier that deprecation has to happen, but I’ll reiterate here. If > doing the things that we know need to be done requires breaking backwards > compatibility, then so be it.
There is no value in preserving backwards compatibility when the backwards that one is maintaining compatibility with is broken in the first place. We *know* 2.6 is insecure. What on earth is the point of maintaining support for a *known insecure* version of a security tool? It's not the Emperor's new suit, it's his beloved threadbare once-fuzzy bathrobe with his hairy ass hanging out the back. -- Phil Stracchino Babylon Communications ph...@caerllewys.net p...@co.ordinate.org Landline: +1.603.293.8485 Mobile: +1.603.998.6958
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ enigmail-users mailing list enigmail-users@enigmail.net To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here: https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net
