At 06:51 PM 3/17/2003 +0100, Cristalle Azundris Sabon wrote:Hall Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've seen evidence mentioned before and that it's related to > Enlightenment somehow. What's the official deal with that ?? As I > recall, evidence's website doesn't even mention E, or if it does, > certainly not prominently.
You know, you're right.
I hacked up a token page when I put ev on SF because I routinely ignore projects that even their authors think isn't worthy of a page (or more to the point, screenshots : ), and then went back to coding. I simply forgot to update the page when ev wasn't vapor anymore. It is fixed now. Thankyou.
evidence is e-related in the following ways:
- Can be linked against e17 libraries -- evas, eet, edb, ebg, almost the whole enchilada -- for enhanced eye-candy. This is the preferred setup.
<snip>
inasmuch there are optional loaders so people can reuse scrollbars and stuff made for e17 (with etcher).
Well, how well does it operate with e17 ?? I'm currently trying "another" WM... :) Been using E 0.16.x for what seems like a looonnnngg time and I'm simply not interested in keeping up with CVS stuff (e17) anymore. I'm certainly looking forward to the day it settles down and will probably come back.
Doh !! That should say "how well does it operate WITHOUT e17 !! :)
Anyway, I looked at the download page and see that ebg, edb, etc are *required".
Hall
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
