At 11:39 AM 11/3/2003, Cristalle Azundris Sabon wrote:
> It sounds to me like you're saying Eterm isn't a "serious" terminal
> and isn't suitable for "serious" usage.  I think I should be
> offended. ;-P

  I've found it capable and stable in prolonged serious use.
  I also found it pretty, decent theming provided.
  Clearly, it meets the requires of both "sleek" and "useful/reliable."
  Hence I think it's fair to say that eterm is "more than a serious
  terminal."

Maybe I missed it, but did the original request/suggestion mention "why" ?? Or is just to be something different ??


Hall



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to