On Monday, 10 November 2003, at 22:04:57 (+0100), Kim Woelders wrote: > I have E running with imlib2 (configure --with-imlib2) as well as > imlib1. The port is done mostly by changing the code to the imlib2 > API and using preprocessor macros to map these to the imlib1 API > when using that. dox isn't ported yet. The imlib2 as well as the > imlib1 versions seem quite stable to me, but I cannot imagine that > there aren't bugs in both. I'm not really sure what to do with > this. Commit it? Post a patch? Does anybody have an opinion?
By all means, commit that fucker. :-) Having just made a good solid release, I see no reason not to go ahead and make massive changes to CVS as needed. Besides, the more we test the new Imlib2 stuff, the better. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "Perhaps someday we will discover that space and time are simpler than the human equation." -- Jean-Luc Picard, ST:TNG ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
