On Saturday, 06 March 2004, at 08:48:28 (+0100), Kim Woelders wrote: > I think we could be a bit pragmatic about the name of a program that > is probably never ever called explicitly.
Hrmph. You're no fun. :-P > Actually, I think it should be moved to $EROOT/bin/ (e.g. > /usr/share/enlightenment/bin/) together with epp. Then it wouldn't > have to be renamed. Binaries should not be in /usr/share. That's what /usr/libexec is for. On Saturday, 06 March 2004, at 03:03:40 (-0500), Mike Frysinger wrote: > generally putting arch-specific binary data in /usr/share is frowned > upon ... moving it to /usr/lib/enlightenment/ would be the standard > alternative, but seems overkill if it's the only thing in there ... libexec, not lib. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "You've got more paranoid fantasies than Stephen King on crack." -- Mr. James, Newsradio ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
