Thanks, I have autoconf 2.59 and automakr 1.8.3. I solved it by running autoheader. Interestingly enough I tried ./missing autoheader as that was supposed to generate it but it gave me an error about autoheader not being found even though it ran from the command line.
Jeremy On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 04:31, Ben Rockwood wrote: > Jeremy Kolb wrote: > > >etox fails to compile. configure reports that it cannot find > >config.h.in. > > > >configure: creating ./config.status > >config.status: creating Makefile > >config.status: creating etox-config > >config.status: creating src/Makefile > >config.status: creating test/Makefile > >config.status: creating doc/Makefile > >config.status: creating config.h > >config.status: error: cannot find input file: config.h.in > > > > > > > > > This is a problem with your toolset, not Etox. > > Please upgrade autoconf to version 2.58, and while your at it make sure > you have automake 1.7.7 or better. > Also, I'll note here that I've had some problems with automake 1.8, so > be wary. > > Make sure you have a clean tree and you can run the stages by hand > looking for errors: > libtoolize first, then aclocal, then autoheader. Autoheader is part of > autoconf and actually generates > the config.h.in file. > > Also, several distros are now using control scripts to manage autof00 > versions. If so, make sure you > use the WANT_AUTO(blah) env vars. Ala... > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] etox$ which autoconf > /usr/bin/autoconf > [EMAIL PROTECTED] etox$ file /usr/bin/autoconf > /usr/bin/autoconf: symbolic link to `../lib/autoconf/ac-wrapper.pl' > [EMAIL PROTECTED] etox$ env | grep -i ^want > WANT_AUTOCONF=2.5 > WANT_AUTOMAKE=1.7 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] etox$ autoconf --version > autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.58 > > > benr.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
