* Didier Casse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 11/05/04, at 12:09 -0400, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Yes, but you didn't *ask*, you told.  Had you asked, I probably
> > would've worded it differently.  :-)
> 
> I now know what was wrong. In line 5 of the etox configure.in, it's
> written
> 
> AM_CONFIG_HEADER(config.h)
> 
> but if I change it to AC_CONFIG_HEADERS(config.h), it compiles
> nicely. Apparently the new automake versions do not like AM_..._HEADER
> but prefers AC_..._HEADERS. I got this info from these automake mailing
> lists. 
>  
> Now let me rephrase correctly :-p, are you guys going to change this line
> or must I instruct my scripts to change the line on my machine and
> compile?
> 
This fixed someone else's compile errors on #edevelop.  Thanks Didier.  Does
someone want to commit this ?

__
Corey Donohoe
http://www.atmos.org/


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband
Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest
6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to