On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 19:53 -0500, Michael Jennings wrote: > Your preference doesn't enter into it, to be blunt. The use of DB > files was discussed and decided on a long time ago. You're not saying > anything here that hasn't been said before...just reopening old > gripes.
Well, excuse me. Don't be elitist. > > > IMHO, there is no advantage to having that ONE file as an edb > > one. No other part of entrance uses it. > > So you're advocating turning this one particular file into text and > leaving the rest as DB files? That doesn't sound very *consistent*, > now does it? :-) No. There is one db file that Entrance uses. The rest are EET. This config file is in etc where all but one file I can think of are text. I fail to see how my "gripe" as you call it is unreasonable. I also fail to see how making a config file open, without having to write a program to edit it is unreasonable, > > HTH, > Michael > I suppose, it depends on who you think your audience is. If it's people like me, end users that enjoy the latest in tech trends and like to tinker, then your library-only approach to configuration editing is not going to fly. If it's a narrow group of programmers and graphics wizards, then I suppose it will be fine. However, just because someone thinks there is a more practical way to do something is no reason to flame. If I am too "ignorant" for your tastes then perhaps I am wasting my time trying to figure out what E is all about. -- Peter ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
