joel vennin wrote: [snip]
[snip]
* it should support at least icq and better also aim. where is jabber used?
Maybe here is the war :p In fact, why i want jabber protocol instead of other, it's because the first of all is that Jabber is free, there is rfc about this protocol and you can get all information you want about this protocol. Another thing, is that i want use this eim :p as a test platform developpment for JEPS. I think the question is why you used icq or aim, it's because all the mainstream use these protocol ? My opinion is that jabber propose passerel to aim and icq and i'musing jabber this many years and i've got never problem with it. It's right that for now, there is no implementation of the voice support but we will can do it (i wish). So my question is why not suggest other people to used the jabber protocol ? It's why and it's my think about the choice of the jabber protocol.
Seems like from what you both are saying supporting Jabber as well as other protocols is natural. I'm sure there is lots of code out there to support Jabber already.
Certainly as a modular addition, Jabber would be a great candidate.
-- In Reach Technology: http://www.inreachtech.net/
Robert G. Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 559.304.5122
You are a bundle of energy, always on the go.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
