On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:12:42 +0800 Didier Casse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(Bbabbled:
(B
(B> On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:20:16 -0500, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(Bwrote:
(B> > On Monday, 21 February 2005, at 01:35:30 (-0800),
(B> > E CVS List wrote:
(B> >
(B> > > Enlightenment CVS committal
(B> > >
(B> > > Author : raster
(B> > > Project : e17
(B> > > Module : libs/imlib2
(B> > >
(B> > > Dir : e17/libs/imlib2
(B> > >
(B> > >
(B> > > Modified Files:
(B> > > configure.in
(B> > >
(B> > >
(B> > > Log Message:
(B> > >
(B> > >
(B> > > change versions. some went DOWN - because they arent releases and i'm
(Btrying
(B> > > to remove the _pre ascii from the version. i added a .001 (a release
(Bnumber)
(B> > > so we can automatically or easiyl generate releases... sorry guys. but
(Bit's
(B> > > kind of "for the good of the code". :)
(B> >
(B> > This should only have been done for the few packages that actually had
(B> > the _pre in the version to begin with. In particular, doing this to
(B> > Imlib2 is just plain silly.
(B> >
(B> > Can we please undo this for those packages that don't need it?
(B> >
(B> > Michael
(B>
(B> E has also been downgraded from 0.17-xxx to 0.16.999.001. Hmm from the
(B> point of view of an rpm managed system, if somebody doesn't realize
(B> this and do something like:
(B>
(B> apt-get update or yum check-update... they would never be able to know
(B> that there exist a latest version coz the latest one has a lower
(B> version! Same applies to some efls. I'm not saying this is right or
(B> wrong but we need to tell the people that there's been a regression in
(B> the version numbering so that they wipe out the older versions first.
(B> ;-)
(B
(Byes :0 thats why it's in my commit log - we need to do this for sanity. i
(Bdowngraded ONLY those packages that were pre_ something and needed downgrading.
(Bthe extra .001 is now instead of that - and lets us to just a set of releases
(Bwithout having to bum the maj/min/micro version. we can bump those separately as
(Bneeded. so the .specs just need to add an extra version filed (the .001). it may
(Bbe time to make all the packaging stuff auto-generated... :/
(B
(B
(B--
(B------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
(BThe Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
$BMg9%B?(B [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(BTokyo, Japan ($BEl5~(B $BF|K\(B)
(B
(B
(B-------------------------------------------------------
(BSF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
(BRead honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
(BDiscover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
(Bhttp://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
(B_______________________________________________
(Benlightenment-devel mailing list
([email protected]
(Bhttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
