On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:15:55 -0500 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On Friday 11 March 2005 12:13 pm, Michael Jennings wrote: > > Are you certain? I believe the .la files contain dependency > > information for those systems that require it. The .a files are > > certainly unnecessary, though, and can be easily omitted using the > > --disable-static parameter to autogen.sh/configure. > > i think we're talking about the .la files for the loaders, not the main > 'libImlib2.*' files ... in the normal course of things, if you link against > libImlib2.so and have it load say jpeg.so, jpeg.la and jpeg.a are not > needed ... the .la file is only used by libtool at build time which is why > you always want libImlib2.la ... > > i dont think it's possible at all to link against the loaders directly is it ? > so shouldnt the loader's .a and .la files be prunned from the normal `make > install` target ? yup - they probably should be - but i havent gotten in the mood to play atuofoo games to do this lately :) -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 裸好多 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本) ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
