On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 18:08:01 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Wednesday 31 August 2005 10:23 am, Michael Jennings wrote: > > On Wednesday, 31 August 2005, at 01:43:47 (-0400), > > > > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > it makes a difference to us distro maintainers who wish to remove it > > > > To what end? What do you hope to accomplish? What does removing it > > gain you that makes it worth the effort (not to mention the added > > configure/Makefile cruft)? > > well, as you can see, some distro's like to clamp down on RPATH's (for > whatever reasons/policies/boredom) > > so Eterm is going to be changed, it'd just be nice if we could do it with a > simple ./configure option rather than patching it ourselves ;) > -mike but what is the REASON for this rpath removal policy? i'm curious to know why! i'm wondering how it causes problems or breaks things or such... ? i'd really like to know! :) -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 裸好多 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本) ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
