On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:12:48 -0400 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Tuesday, 27 September 2005, at 10:24:28 (+0200), > Andreas Volz wrote: > > > Only one example. I think the default settings should be what most > > users like and not what the main developers like. > > The work of developing the software is significant. The work of > making multiple optional behaviors and keeping them working properly > together in all combinations is even more significant. One of the > small perks of doing all that work is getting the defaults set the way > you want them. > > Surely the community would not wish to begrudge us even that one small > "reimbursement" for our time.... indeed - and at any rate -as long as its in heavy dev in cvs it will keep settings the devs like - maybe towards the final release a default settings set will be brewed up that cover the majority of users, but... until then... we devs get to have what we want by default :) -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 裸好多 Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本) ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
