On 10/18/05, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday, 17 October 2005, at 11:51:00 (+0800),
> Didier Casse wrote:
>
> > Eterm-0.9.4-1.20051016cvs.i386.rpm
> >             ^
> > libast-0.7-1.20051016cvs.i386.rpm
> >            ^
>
> Please be careful with release numbers.  When Eterm 0.9.4 and libast
> 0.7 final are released, your users will not be able to upgrade
> normally to the released versions, 0.9.4-1 and 0.7-1 respectively.
>

My Perl program reads from your CVS configure.in (or fo some packages
like embrace it's configure.ac) to pickup the current version. E.g.
(line 25)

AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(Eterm, 0.9.4)

That's how it's able to keep track of some of those version changes of
the packages in CVS.
It worked well so far. It might not be the best solution but it's one
way of seeing it.

When Eterm is officially released, I'll just make a big announcement
to wipe out the *old* one. The close to 10,000 users  that hang on to
the repo read my news page. :)

When raster's downgraded some packages, everybody knew in one way or
another that it has been downgraded by reading some form of news and
they removed the old stuff. So this might not be that big of an issue.

Maybe this form would have been better
Eterm-0.9.3.999-1.20051016cvs.i386.rpm but be reassured that I will
make sure that the users can upgrade to a new release.

--
With kind regards,
Didier.

------------
Yum/apt repository for DR17/EFL: http://sps.nus.edu.sg/~didierbe

Didier F.B Casse
PhD candidate, Singapore Synchrotron Light Source (SSLS)
National University of Singapore.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to