On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 09:04:29 -0700 Blake Barnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > >actually - evoak was an entirely different beast. :) > > > > > > > > I know it's entirely different, but it _allows_ some of the same > features. And I'm assuming that one of the big reasons for emu is to not really. evoak was C on both ends. it was a remote canvas display pipe only. david is looking at something more more abstract :) > allow anyone to create an app that can gain the benefits of the e17 > canvas without creating a module... Sure sounds like the original set of > features evoak provided. :) > > If I'm wrong there please enlighten me! > > -Blake > -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 裸好多 Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本) ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
