On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 09:37:29 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 19:00:25 +0200 Bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > My guess (to be verified) is that X should be started long time > > enough after getty's are ready... > > So, completely opposite to witch 0, witch 1 looks like it happens more > often on fast machines than slow ones. Bugger, this is not the type > of shenanigans I would like to test on my main machine, the P100 is > the test box. Lets me get on with other things while testing. > > On the other hand, witch 1 may respond to just inserting some pauses > in likely places. > > I'll go witch hunting on the weekend. Sorry guys, this witch hunt will be delayed. I was off to a good start, getting witch spoor on the P100, and I was able to ssh into the box when it was witch entranced, and poke around under her skirt. But then Real Life intruded, and I was unable to spend more time on it. Rest assured, this witch will burn, eventually.
pgprxqO4TdkWl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
