On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 17:40:15 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> jochen wrote: > > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > >>On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:55:37 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>babbled: > >> > >> > >> > >>>OK, I just rebuild all of EFL and E with the above flags and the error > >>>is gone, so it seems it was a optimization bug, and I thought I was > >>>conservative with the optimization. Thanks for the explanations. Well if > >>>I find some time I might even dig into it to find out which compiler > >>>option it is, not tonight though, I'll go see the kiwis whip some > >>>kangoroo ass ;-) (for those who don't know what the heck I'm talking > >>>about, I'm going to watch the Australia against New Zealand rugby league > >>>game) > >> > >> > >>AARGH!!!!!! and now its gone? what version of gcc do you use? personalyl i > >>compile everything (in efl) with these cflags: -O2 -march=pentium4 -g -msse > >>-mmmx -pipe > >> > >>on my p4 boxes, and > >>-O2 -march=pentium3 -fomit-frame-pointer -msse -mmmx -pipe > >> > >>on my p3 boxes. i've never seen the bugs you are describing and i cannto > >>produce, reproduce or even make sens of the debug info you are getting. i > >>suspect it could be some compiler weirdness/bug. i'm not sure. but all in > >>all - this is a hard thing to track. based on the bugs i have seen - they > >>SEEM impossible looking at the code, every time, UNLESS there is a compielr > >>bug, OR some memory corruption which i am unaware of to date :( > >> > > > > OK I just recompiled with gcc 3.4.4 bug is still there. I also tested > > the eap file. I decompiled and recompiled the eap file, changed the > > image, that all had no effect. The next strange thing is, e doesn't > > segfault anymore when I do the same thing to gnome-terminal, although I > > haven't changed anything with that eap file. However I changed the > > default size, or font, or something because I used gnome terminal when > > in gnome on my other partition. This is just getting stranger and stranger. > > Cheers > > Jochen > > Correction gnome-terminal does still segfault. Also I just realized both > eterm and gnome-terminal only segfault when they are the only window > left on the desktop. I am not quite sure if that was the same way > before, but I am sure that the backtraces I sent earlier were done when > several eterms were open. However I never got to the actual segfaulting > part in those tests. i HATE to do this... but "does it work now" ? :) i haven't heard much more on this lately and i don't know anymore than i did... so... ? -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 裸好多 Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本) ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
