On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 13:44:22 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:25:34 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > babbled: > > > On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 18:26:17 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > you need to add the concept of ecore objects. then being able to > > > attach things to the ecore objects - that includes keepign the > > > callback handler list within the object, not in the global list. > > > so now it will walk only the list of callbacks that it will > > > finally be calling. otherwise your idea is good - it's just that > > > you really need to remove the useless walking as u wont really > > > save much. :) > > > > That was gonna be my next suggestion. I didn't want to hit you > > with it all at once, the email was already too long. I did hint at > > that though. > > > > Apart from Ecore_Exe, what other Ecore things will we want to do > > this for? > > not a lot. ecore doesn't have much at all. u have things build on top > (ecore_con, ecore_x etc.)... I'll do something for Ecore_Exe, and if anything else wants it, we can generalise from there.
pgpyAaEYvuYb2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
