On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 16:03:01 -0600 Brian Mattern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 March 2006 14:46, phriedrich wrote: > > I think we should have the modules-section of get-e.org mentioning > > all the modules, maybe even the ones coming with e itself and have > > a note like "built in" or "get it from cvs" or something like that. I > > just guess this would looking much better (or impressive :) > > How about releasing tarballs at stable points in module dev, and > sticking those up on get-e? The modules are in cvs to facilitate > development (and not as an alternative distribution method), so its > still up to the maintainer to release packages (binary or source) for > distribution. Assuming the autofoo is working properly, it should only > require a 'make dist' and an upload. :) I think this would be a good idea. Stable snapshots of the modules on get-e.org and the devel-versions on CVS. But nevertheless, I'd also mention CVS-only modules on get-e.org, just because a list of all our great modules would look more impressive. Best regards, Friedrich
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
