On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 13:44:40 -0500 "Tom Wile" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> I'd like to know what the status is on this patch. I addressed the concerns > Tilman had, at least I think I have. I need some direction to continue > refining this patch so it can be accepted. Of course disregard the first > diff I sent, but take a look at the second one. status: i have a checkmark next to the mail in my mailbox - ie "look at this mail and do something" mark. :) so at some point in the near future (which could be a few hours, days or even weeks) i will get to it - unfortunately i have something like 20-30 of these marked mails floating around... :( > On 6/11/06, ZigsMcKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I've been working on the edje library. I just added a bunch of options > > for the "set_state_val" function in an .edc file. I've recompiled > > everything w/this code and everything seems to work fine. > > > > Also took care of some compiler warnings. > > > > One thing I found when running gdb on the edje program. It seems that a > > lot of a text objects settings are calculated twice. Once in > > _edje_part_recalc (edje_calc.c). And then in _edje_text_recalc_apply > > (edje_text.c). Am I right in this? > > > > - Zigs > > > > > > > > > > > -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 裸好多 Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本) _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
