Hi, Are there any objections to me:
1) changing the parameter name on array creation to "size" from "step" 2) adding eina_array_size_set which additionally does not take a sizeof param 3) deprecate the eina_array_step_set as it's semantics are strange (as per previous email). Thanks. Andy On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 at 13:04 Andrew Williams <a...@andywilliams.me> wrote: > Hi, > > When talking about arrays my understanding that "step" typically refers to > the number of items to jump when iterating (i.e. 1). However the eina docs > use step on initialisation and on step_set to indicate "size" or "count". > > Additionally eina_array_step_set takes a parameter sizeof_eina_array which > is documented to need to be sizeof(Eina_Array), but obviously the > eina_array is the first parameter. Is there any reason why we have to pass > that parameter? > What I am wonder is - can't we just create "eina_array_size_set(uint)"? > > Thanks, > Andy > -- > http://andywilliams.me > http://ajwillia.ms > -- http://andywilliams.me http://ajwillia.ms ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
