Hello.

On 24.07.2018 16:07, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> Regarding the edje function:
> 
> https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4403
> 
> It looks like the function prototype was just removed during this
> conversion and then never added back?

Good point.

Conrad, could you shed some light one what happened to
edje_object_color_class_description_get ?

We are looking into API breaks for the 1.21 release and wonder what
happened with this function.

regards
Stefan Schmidt

> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 5:28 AM Stefan Schmidt <ste...@datenfreihafen.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> Hello.
>>
>> On 24.07.2018 10:46, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> One of the big missing steps towards a 1.21 release is to make sure we
>>> are not breaking ABI or API from older releases. If you want to help
>>> with the release please spare an hour and look over the report from ABI
>>> Laboratory and help to identify if we have any breaks not related to our
>>> beta APIs.
>>>
>>>
>> https://abi-laboratory.pro/index.php?view=objects_report&l=efl&v1=1.20.7&v2=1.21.0-alpha1
>>
>> My personal review is below. I ignored all beta and EO APIs here.
>>
>> Added:
>> Ecore_Common.h, libecore.so.1.21.0
>> ecore_init_ex ( int argc, char** argv )
>> ecore_shutdown_ex ( )
>>
>> I think the names are not descriptive at all. What should the _ex stand
>> for here? The API description speaks about propagating events on the
>> main loop after init and callback setup.
>>
>>
>> Removed:
>> edje_object.eo.legacy.h, libedje.so.1.20.7
>> edje_object_color_class_description_get ( Edje_Object const* obj, char
>> const* color_class )
>>
>> It could be argued that it was part of the edje_onject, but it was
>> exposed as legacy API none the less? I still can find an EAPI definition
>> in edje_util.c for it. Would be great if someone could shed some light
>> on this one.
>>
>> regards
>> Stefan Schmidt
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> _______________________________________________
>> enlightenment-devel mailing list
>> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to