On 22/08/2018 05:42, Felipe Magno de Almeida wrote: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:25 AM Christophe Sadoine <ch...@indefini.org> > wrote: >> > > [snip] > >> I agree the voting was a bit weird. >> And I think there should only be a vote against a proposal if a >> consensus cannot be reached. > > IMO, voting features out was the weirdest thing I've seen in a while. > > [snip] > > Regards, >
I tend to agree, a list of features is good enough, if a feature becomes really controversial and some devs think it should be allowed and others don't then sure have a vote on the feature where everyone votes yes or no for that one feature, but the voting system as it is seems kinda weird and mostly pointless. -- Simon Lees (Simotek) http://simotek.net Emergency Update Team keybase.io/simotek SUSE Linux Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30 GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
