Hi,

I also agree completely with Xavi. Especially on naming it ntoh() for 
discoverability as it is the well known expected name for it.

As for the implementation, maybe move it into an inline .x file, but no strong 
opinion there.

Cedric

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Tuesday, December 18, 2018 7:07 AM, Xavi Artigas <xavierarti...@gmail.com> 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Certainly, including winsock2.h just to define ntoh() is an extreme
> overkill! Your proposal sounds very sensible to me.
> Regarding the names, I also prefer the shorter version, since ntoh() is
> well known enough, but this is very arguable so I won't argue about it.
>
> If this is finally accepted, I suggest you submit it through Phab and
> undergo the regular review process :P
>
> Xavi
>
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 at 15:00, Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Hello
> > i would like to introduce in eina (more precisely in eina_cpu)
> > implementations of ntohl and al. The reason is: on Windows, it
> > requires to link against winsock2 and include winsock2.h, with
> > introduce compilation errors with libjpeg in Emile (they both redefine
> > the same types, with different definition (bool is an int or a char,
> > etc...)
> > On unix, it requires also network header files.
> > so a solution would be to redefine ntohl in eina, using eina_swap*
> > ntohl and al. are not critical functions. I also looked at the asm
> > code generated by gcc with optimizations and it uses bswap, so the
> > functions are well optimized.
> > it would also reduce non cross platform code (inclusion of winsock2.h
> > or netinet/in.h or arpa/inet.h, no more -lws2_32 link (and even better
> > : no more dynamic link with ws2_32.dll in non-network files))
> > I've attached the source code. I would like your opinion about the names.
> > raster proposed eina_swap_from_bigendian_()
> > i would prefer eina_ntoh() : it's a smaller name, the functions are 
> > wellknown
> > thank you
> > Vincent
> >
> > enlightenment-devel mailing list
> > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>
> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel




_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to