I think it's just preference problem. Anyhow, I prefer e-devel discussion
But both are fine to me because both do functions enough. On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 6:05 PM Tom Hacohen <t...@stosb.com> wrote: > Hey, > > That's something I've been complaining about both on IRC and recently on > phab too, so glad to see you take action about it! > > It's really hard to follow what's going on in the EFL world if you just > want to follow the high-level design discussions rather than every typo > fix patch / bug. I don't have enough time to follow everything that's > going on on Phab, which means I miss the high-level discussions (if they > even happen), which is a pity.I'm sure I'm not the only one. > > -- > Tom > > On 03/09/2019 18:31, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > I've noticed over time - the last few years a lot of discussion has > broken down > > for various reasons. It's being moved to phab as tickets or review where > it > > SHOULD be a discussion here on the mailing list. > > > > Years ago we agreed on how to work. Phab would be for review and bug > tickets. > > Mailing list would be for discussion of things like design or broader > issues, > > and major direction/design changes. > > > > It's time to bring things back here. Phab is not the right forum for > > discussions. Tickets are not replacements for mailing list threads. > > > > So can we do what we agreed to do years ago - use our tools > appropriately? Many > > of you will remember these discussions on how to work together, so you > know > > what I'm talking about. Can we do that? :) > > > > > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > -- Regards, Hermet _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
