On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 12:34 AM Jose R R <jose....@metztli.com> wrote: > > Niltze [Hello]- > > On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 1:46 PM Boris Faure <bo...@fau.re> wrote: > > > > ========================================================== > > “Oops” > > Boris Faure > > ========================================================== > > > > Hello fellow Terminology enthusiasts! > > > > Yesterday's release was not done correctly. This is now fixed, as seen > > in the change log below: > > > > == Fixes == > > * Build and install the Default colorscheme > > * Correctly set the version > > > > == Download == > > The tarball can be found at : > > - > > https://download.enlightenment.org/rel/apps/terminology/terminology-1.12.1.tar.xz > > - https://downloads.terminolo.gy/terminology-1.12.1.tar.xz > > > > sha256sum: > > f8ced9584c2e9ae87452ce7425fd25b2d3e122c7489785d2917890215c6b5aa9 > > > > Happy compiling! ( https://xkcd.com/303/ ) > > -- > > Boris Faure > > Pointer Arithmetician > > _______________________________________________ > > enlightenment-devel mailing list > > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > > > Using Terminology 1.12.1 . Thank you for your cool app! > > I have a dark background with greyish fonts, i.e., Settings -> Colors > -> Default (as set in Terminology.) > Notwithstanding, I think I came across an issue. I use zsh and > recently have been using the fc built in command extensively. > fc -l works by listing the previous (default) 15 commands entered, etc.. > > Issue is when editing a previous command, say number xyz: > > fc xyz (the vim editor opens up with the numbered command ready to be > edited; yet all the fonts become black -- the same color as the vim > editor background, i.e., the procedure does not respect the font > colors set in Terminology). Obviously, the command to be edited > becomes unreadable. Additionally, typing the ':q' vim command to quit > the editing mode, the command pasted to the Terminology prompt remains > in black fonts[!]; accordingly, the user does not know what was the > command edited/pasted because it is in black fonts. > > I have tested Gnome-Terminal -- zsh -- with black background and white > fonts and issue with fc editing is not there. > > Heck, I have been extensively using OS/2 Warp 3 with Korn Shell (daddy > to zsh) -- black background and white fonts -- utilized fc editing and > issue is not there. > < https://metztli.blog/ixiptli/os-2-warp3 > >
Probably I spoke too soon. I have another instance of Terminology, same version, running in a Debian Bullseye (the previous one was Buster) which does not exhibit the fc issue elaborated 'a priori'. Sorry about that -- I will have to analyze the Buster instance as I am doing some extensive work there. Best Professional Regards. -- Jose R R http://metztli.it --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Download Metztli Reiser4: Debian Bullseye w/ Linux 5.16.20 AMD64 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- feats ZSTD compression https://sf.net/projects/metztli-reiser4/ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- or SFRN 5.1.3, Metztli Reiser5 https://sf.net/projects/debian-reiser4/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Official current Reiser4 resources: https://reiser4.wiki.kernel.org/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
