On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 01:16:13AM -0400, Enlightenment CVS wrote: > Enlightenment CVS committal > > Author : onefang > Project : e17 > Module : libs/ecore > > Dir : e17/libs/ecore/src/lib/ecore_desktop > > > Modified Files: > Makefile.am ecore_desktop_private.h > Removed Files: > ecore_desktop_xml.c > > > Log Message: > We already have an xml parser, we don't need another one. >
In seb's defense, do we? The big comment at the start of of ecore_desktop_xmlame.c says "This is NOT a real XML parser." I always took that as meaning "stop-gap solution until we have a better (but still light) xml parser. You've said several times that it only does enough to support desktop files. If I throw it a desktop file that is valid xml but goes beyond the minimal amount that xmlame supports, will it work? rephorm ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
