Nikolas Arend [2006-10-19 13:59]: > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:14:21 +0200 Nikolas Arend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > babbled: > > > > > >> Massimo Maiurana wrote: > >> > >>> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman), il 18/10/2006 00:57, scrisse: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> see the above - add a printf and see what that func actually returns - > >>>> but > >>>> i bet you it is saying that it DOESNT do patented hinting. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> ok, I'll try recompiling freetype first, but I would like to know > >>> how your ft2 is configured. > >>> in my ftoption.h I see these options commented: > >>> /* #define FT_EXPORT(x) extern x */ > >>> /* #define FT_EXPORT_DEF(x) x */ > >>> > >>> could it be my problems are related to this? > >>> also, in tt driver configuration I see this undefined: > >>> #undef TT_CONFIG_OPTION_COMPONENT_OFFSET_SCALED > >>> > >>> should I define it? > >>> > >>> can you send me your ftoption.h so that I can see what are the > >>> differences between yours and mine? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> I don't have the time atm to get deeper into this, so I can't add > >> anything valuable to this thread and the solution. But I too used > >> bytecode hinting with my self-compiled ft2 2.2.1 and enlightenment cvs > >> on FC4 not so long ago. Now (since a few revisions) the bytecode option > >> is greyed out. That means ft2 seems to be able to do bytecode hinting, > >> so probably s.th. has changed in e/EFL. > >> > >> Cheers, Nick. > >> > > > > works here on debian and ubunutu. the code in evas looks right. and it works > > here. since you are compiling and installing your own ft2's i can only > > surmise > > something is wrong with your install of ft2 and how it reports if it can do > > bytecode or not. > > > > > But since it worked before with the very same ft2 install, there is > supposed to be a change in how enlightenment checks whether ft2 can do > bytecode hinting (or is willing to ;-). Maybe that can help to get to > the bottom of this problem. Don't get me wrong, I don't say it's e's fault.
Maybe you used the bytecode interpreter although only the _patented_ bits of code weren't enabled. That one will yield BAD results with most TTFs, so Evas will only accept the _patented_ bytecode interpreter. See http://freetype.fis.uniroma2.it/freetype2/docs/reference/ft2-ttengine.html I'm sure that the Evas code is correct :) Regards, Tilman -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
pgphnuXX474Kx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
