On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 09:13:05 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:25:23 -0400 "Hazen Valliant-Saunders" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm just curious anyone doing daily builds on Gentoo? Viper? > > The intention is to add more OS/CPU variants in the future, either via > qemu or volunteers. There is only so many variants that the current > build box can check without compromising the performance of the rest of > the server. Can't test them all, haven't decided which ones to test > yet. > > Baby steps people, still figuring out some of the basics. B-) though in practice - what does that really buy us? as long as an existing distro HAS the requirements - then non-builds on others are most likely due to not having the requirements (versions of libs etc.). a nightly build + report on 1 distro buys us a fair bit - what has broken and how. multiple distro builds are mostly only useful for making packages (mostly i say - there are cases where 1 distro does strange things compared to another). in the end though - this is where the users come in. we can't go maintaining N distro "chroots" ourselves - there is a point where we stop and users do their bit. i personally say that we should only maintain a distro chroot tree *IF* we are going to build PACKAGES for that distro/architecture. -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 裸好多 Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
