On 8/4/07, Toma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Is an 'all-ok' mail usefull? In my experience it will 'numb' developers > > into not reading > > the mails after a while. It reminds me of Homer Simpson's all-ok alarm :) > > > > regards, > > > > Koen > > Might be a good way to keep a check on the apps that are getting > skipped/non-supported because they are fail and hence, need some TLC?
It looks like the autobuilder served its purpose perfectly. I'm happy to see that developers grew tired of seeing their code reported as not building every freaking morning and did something. I guess the next step would be to try to slim down the skipped list (or work on unsupported build systems), not silence the buildbot until something goes wrong again. BTW I also think that seeing that no package failed to build is good news and it's definitely worth reporting on the dev ml. Bye, Emme > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
