On 9/14/07, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please, no top posts :-) I love this :)
> Having user data to disconnect wouldn't help that much, at least for > our bindings. > > As I said in my email, ETK's signal implementation is far from ideal > and could use some rework. Caio offered to understand it and provide > required patches, let's see what he proposes. Actually it's exactly what we need. I talked to Cairo and he said it could be done this way (exactly like pygtk does). IMHO there is no point in having a id where you have to keep it anyway to disconnect instead of using a disconnection based on callback + user_data (used in Qt/Glib/...). BR ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
