On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2007 5:40 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler >> it even provides a NICE wishlist system. it's friendlier than bugzilla, but >> not >> as powerful. > > > Ok, I really like trac, but keeping both doesn't solve the previous > problem of people not using bugzilla, instead it create another point > of replication. There is already one (maybe more) patch in trac. So we now have to look at two locations for patches. I don't see any problem to have trac storing TODO and such, but, imho, patches should only go to bugzilla (if we keep trac and buzilla) so now, we have mails + bugzilla + trac Vincent ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
