You're probably right that a dep could fix the build failure, but it would be better if we could determine why edje_cc is failing and fix that. These really are independent directories with no shared files, especially on the output.
On 11/30/07, Martin Zwickel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:03:40 -0500 > Will Keaney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> bubbled: > > > FWIW, I've noticed that when building with -j > 1, if I retry the make > > twice it works (so, three 'make' commands in all). So rather than a > > dep, I suspect a race condition between the threads. > > That's what I meant. A missing dep leads to a race condition :) > Because "make" then builds two targets at the same time or in the wrong order > -> > make fails. > > I still think a dep could fix this issue... > > Regards, > Martin > > > -- > MyExcuse: > Forced to support NT servers; sysadmins quit. > > Martin Zwickel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Research & Development > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper > from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going > mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. > http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
