On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 10:39:32 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> > > On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Michael Jennings wrote: > > > On Saturday, 01 December 2007, at 10:39:49 (+0100), > > Vincent Torri wrote: > > > >> Albin Tonnerre (aka Lutin) requested configure scripts to fail when > >> an option is requested with --enable-*, but the dependancies are not > >> met. > >> > >> Albin wrote a patch for that behavior. It's attached. > >> > >> basically, it replaces want_foo="yes" by want_foo="auto" when needed > >> and check if that variable is changed or not when --enable-foo is > >> passed to configure. if --enable-strict is passed to configure, the > >> dependancy is not met and want_foo == yes, then AC_MSG_ERROR is > >> called. > > > > Albin and I discussed it when he first posted it. When I read it > > through the first time, I thought it would break certain things. > > Turns out I had just misread the patch. > > > > It looks fine to me. The default behavior is still the same > > (auto-detect), which is really the most important part, IMHO. > > > > I'd say go for it. If anyone had a strong objection, they've had > > several days (since Albin's original post) to voice them. > > It's commited. Only change : I removed "Error: " in the error messages as > configure already adds an "error: ". seems fine to me - nothing really broke :) -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
