Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > >> On Jan 16, 2008 4:47 PM, Enlightenment CVS >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Enlightenment CVS committal >>> >>> Author : lok >>> Project : e17 >>> Module : libs/e_dbus >>> >>> Dir : e17/libs/e_dbus >>> >>> >>> Modified Files: >>> configure.in >>> >>> >>> Log Message: >>> Added a dependency to Evas. >>> > > >> we really should split e_dbus into lib and apps, damn, having the >> e_dbus to depend on evas is a bit insane... maybe one just want to use >> it with a daemon and this will pull many useless things. >> > > This is just a matter of appropriate packaging. The library itself won't link > to > evas. > > Regards, > > :M: > > Actually libenotify will link to it. It provides a method to convert a gdk pixbuf data to an Evas_Object. The whole build was grouped that's why I added that dep this way.
But I agree we should split e_dbus. Or at least make the build of the other componants (hal, nm and notify) optional. lok ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
